130 posts
Latest Posts by trekkie107 - Page 2
For the first question,After abolishing the slave trade in 1808, Britain spent 62 years hunting down slave ships in the Atlantic.
Wow, 26 guys in 10 minutes? That’s one guy every 30 seconds! That’s literally incredible! As in I don’t believe a fucking word of it!
Source
lol
"Be nice to me and do what I say or I'll hurt you"
How about fuck you?
y’all: it’s so sad these protests are getting violent
me, screaming into the void: THEY WOULDN’T NEED TO GET VIOLENT IF Y'ALL LISTENED IN THE ELECTION
Two rapists on the timeline spreading rape tips.. This is fucking disgusting!
Wow CNN, wanna show just a little more bias?
Tfw when a racist bitch delete and her coon ass friend upset about it
Ha biiiiiitch!
“Two black Nigerians tricked another black Nigerian into America and treated her like a slave. The US authorties got her out and arrested the couple. This proves America is racist.”
My girlfriend dose this exact thing. If he's like me he finds it cute.
I’m watching a show Daddy has never watched before but I’m giving Him updates on everything that’s happening anyway why does He put up w me
OSU
My condolences to everyone involved.
Also…GOVERNMENT GET YOUR SHIT TOGETHER AND PASS SOME GUN CONTROL LAW
I have a collection of these sort of “lmao media” comparisons and showcases of blatant bias and disinformation
Probably the most outrageous thing of President bowl 2016 in my honest imo
And it’s no wonder why everyone was surprised at the upset trump victory, when polling and media reporting were overwhelmingly pro-hillary
Perhaps in the end, the fake polling unintentionally convinced many people who were going to vote democrat that hillary was going to win no matter what. So they stayed home and led to the 6 million less democrat voters that helped secure trump his victory.
Sad!
The green one
That’s right. Just being alone with a woman can get you kicked out of college. Even if she’s not the one who accuses you.
Also, I can’t help but think how terrible the “victim” must feel.
Also from the same writer and paper: woman gives blowjob to blacked-out man, and he gets kicked out.
I need feminism because I am not allowed to go on late night runs alone!
Typing “beautiful women” into a search engine will give you pictures of basic white bitches. And what happens when you search “beautiful BLACK women”? You’ll get some black and white pictures of basic white bitches.
SJW goes off on Lyft driver for the mortal sin of…having a hula girl on his dashboard
Bayzle Morgan, 24, is accused of stealing a man’s motorcycle at gunpoint in Las Vegas, Nevada.
He has tattoos on his head, face and neck, which include the words ‘Baby Nazi’, a swastika and an Iron Cross.
A panel of potential jurors allegedly said they wouldn’t be able to treat Morgan’s case fairly because of the markings, prompting a district judge to require them to be covered.
Morgan showed up in court on Monday covered in concealer – and when his attorney said the make-up had started wearing off, the judge agreed to delay jury selection.
Morgan is to remove the make-up after each day in court before he returns to the Clark County Detention Center.Potential jurors didn’t appear to see Morgan’s tattoos underneath the concealer on Monday, but one of his attorneys, Dan Bunin, said in the early afternoon that two of them had started showing up.
One was the ‘Baby Nazi’ inscription on Morgan’s neck and the other was a teardrop tattoo below his right eye.
Teardrop tattoos can have several meanings. Some signal that the wearer has killed someone, has been in prison, or was part of a gang.
District Judge Richard Scotti allowed a cosmetologist to touch up Morgan’s makeup, delaying jury selection by 30 minutes Monday.
The make-up artist recommended he wear a brown shirt instead of a white or black white for future court dates.
source
So I guess all we need to do is have someone cover us in white face and there’s a chance we will get a fair trial or lenient sentence in court.
I guess it would be a lot easier to just get a police officer Halloween costume.
…what about people that are unattractive? What if they get convicted at higher rates? What about people with constant resting bitch face? What about diminutive people? What about people with non-nazi tattoos which may sway the jury? Finally, and most relevant, what about black people, who there is a proven bias against that is widespread and subconscious? If we’re covering tattoos, then we MUST go whole hog and do blind trials otherwise not everyone is being treated equally under the law (being afforded the same ability to have a bias-less trial) and therefore violating their 6th amendment constitutional right to “an impartial jury of the state”. So, I hope some prominent black lawyer is about to file a lawsuit against the state.
#Justice #BlackLivesMatter #US #StayWoke
Fucking Play Asia, Making me a fan.
Also loving fem freq here “DIS IS SEWIOUS!”
Renamed paint colors.
Well you could use toilet paper.... Oh right thats not free either....
Queens
Maggie Menu
On the menu for Maggie tonight is puréed sweet potato, puréed brown rice, sprouted organic tofu, chia seeds, and digestive enzymes. Does she look excited? She is!
#Savage
A new document has surfaced which shows British women, of all classes, voting in 1843, some 75 years before they received the parliamentary franchise in 1918. History professor, Sarah Richardson, explains what this discovery means and how it was possible:
Occasionally, just occasionally, you encounter a document that radically changes your view of the past. This happened to me very recently. The source was just a few scraps of parchment in a box of solicitors’ papers in Lichfield. But, at a stroke, it provided me with tangible proof that Victorian women were not only eligible to vote, but actually exercised that right, some 75 years before they received the parliamentary franchise in 1918.
The document in question was a poll book for the election to the local office of Assistant Overseer of the Poor, in the parish of St Chad’s, Lichfield in 1843. I was tipped off about its existence by a friend, Philip Salmon of the History of Parliament. It was a schedule of voters, their addresses, the rates they paid and how they voted. But as I looked down the list of names, some immediately jumped off the page: Elizabeth Shorthouse, Hannah Holiman, Phoebe Skelton, Ann Mallett… In all, there were thirty women playing an active role in the election. Although I knew that in theory women retained the right to vote for some local officials in the nineteenth century, I had never seen any evidence of them doing so in practice. This lack of evidence had led me, and many other historians, to assume that voting was entirely a male prerogative before the twentieth century.
The record was compiled because the solicitors were the agents for the Conservative party in Lichfield. The town was a highly marginal constituency in this period, so the party clearly wanted to keep tabs on the political temperature between parliamentary elections. The solicitor would have compiled the poll book from the ballot papers returned by the voters.
In the period before the secret ballot, everyone was entitled to know how people voted. It was unusual to have an election for an Assistant Overseer. This was a powerful post responsible for collecting poor rates and deciding how they were allocated. But the overseers were usually appointed to avoid the expense of an election. All heads of households, paying rates were entitled to vote. This was a very wide franchise, and one that included single and widowed women.
A polling document from 1843 which clearly shows women’s names among those who voted
My assumption was that the women would be of genteel status. But as I checked their names against the 1841 census return, I was surprised to see the diversity of the group of voters. There were a few women of independent means, owning property and land. There were also women, probably widows, who had inherited their husbands’ businesses. So, for example, the wealthiest female elector on the roll was Grace Brown, a butcher, who managed a large household including several servants.
Due to the high rates that she paid, Grace was entitled to four votes in the election, which she cast in favour of the Conservative candidate. But I was amazed to see many women on the list who were far lower down the social scale including the laundress, Caroline Edge, the servant, Sarah Payne and even paupers, including Sarah Batkin of Stowe Street.
The poll book is all that remains of an unremarkable local parish election in a comfortable Midlands market town in the mid nineteenth century. Yet, it has prompted a need to re-write the history books by providing the first substantial proof that women were able to vote long before they received the parliamentary or municipal franchise.
Sarah Richardson is an Associate Professor in History at the University of Warwick and author of The Political Worlds of Women: Gender and Politics in Nineteenth Century Britain.
Beyond rumors: it’s official. Star Trek returns to TV!
Art by Andy Kluthe